So what happens if the cuts proposed by House Budget Committee Chairman Paul Ryan (R-Wis.) and House Appropriations Committee Chairman Hal Rogers (R-Ky.) prove unacceptable to the Senate and the president? What if there is no compromise? What if nobody gives in?
A budget deadlock played out over months will doom Obama and assure his defeat. But an easily won compromise will help him get re-elected.
The central question in Obamas bid for a second term is: Will the issues that doomed his party in 2010 still be the key questions in 2012? If they are we already know how the election will come out. If they are not Obama can win.
When the president says he does not want to re-fight the battles of the past two years he means that he embraces this reality. He doesnt want Obamacare high spending huge deficits cap and trade card check and the like to be the items in discussion in the 2012 election.
But he has failed to put forward a compelling agenda for the next two years. That was the essential defect of his State of the Union speech -- nobody is going to storm any barricades for high-speed rail and more R&D spending.
If the Republicans hold firm in demanding huge spending cuts and Obama does not give in the question of whether or not to cut spending will dominate the nations political discourse for months on end and will spill over into the 2012 election.
To assure that it will the Republicans should hold firm to their budget spending cuts without surrender or compromise. If necessary it is OK to vote a few very short-term continuing resolutions to keep the government open for a few weeks at a time always keeping on the pressure.
When the debt limit vote comes up they should refuse to allow an increase without huge cuts in spending. If the debt-limit deadline passes they should force the administration to scramble to cobble together enough money to operate for weeks at a time.
If Obama offers a half a loaf the GOP should spurn it for weeks and months. Then rather than actually shut down the government let them accept some variant of their proposed cuts but only give in return a few more weeks time at which point the issue will be re-litigated. Dont go for Armageddon -- just keep fighting the battle.
Same with the debt limit. Extend it for a few hundred billion dollars and then go back for more cuts in return for a further extension. Make Obama pay for each continuing resolution and each debt-limit hike with more cuts to spending.
Always avoid cuts in Medicare and Social Security. Save those for after 2012. For now focus on Medicaid block granting and discretionary spending (including some modest cuts in defense).
Like a guerrilla army never go to a shutdown (a general engagement) but keep coming up with cuts compromising letting the government stay open for a few more weeks letting the debt limit rise a few hundred billion and then come back for more cuts and repeat the cycle.
And dont just demand spending cuts. Go for defunding of Obamacare blocking the EPA from carbon taxation and regulation a ban on card-check unionization and constraints on the FCCs regulation of the Internet and talk radio. Put those items on the table each time each session.
Every time the issues come up every time the cuts are litigated Obamas efforts to appear to be a centrist will be frustrated. Time and again he will have to oppose spending cuts. Over and over he will come across as the liberal he is battling for each dime and opposing any defunding.
Obamas campaign strategy has two elements: Change the subject from the 09-10 agenda and move to the center. A tough determined Republican budget offensive embracing all these elements and fought in this guerrilla style will frustrate both and lead to his defeat.
So what happens if the cuts proposed by House Budget Committee Chairman Paul Ryan (R-Wis.) and House Appropriations Committee Chairman Hal Rogers (R-Ky.) prove unacceptable to the Senate and the president? What if there is no compromise? What if nobody gives in?
A budget deadlock played out over months will doom Obama and assure his defeat. But an easily won compromise will help him get re-elected.
The central question in Obamas bid for a second term is: Will the issues that doomed his party in 2010 still be the key questions in 2012? If they are we already know how the election will come out. If they are not Obama can win.
When the president says he does not want to re-fight the battles of the past two years he means that he embraces this reality. He doesnt want Obamacare high spending huge deficits cap and trade card check and the like to be the items in discussion in the 2012 election.
But he has failed to put forward a compelling agenda for the next two years. That was the essential defect of his State of the Union speech -- nobody is going to storm any barricades for high-speed rail and more R&D spending.
If the Republicans hold firm in demanding huge spending cuts and Obama does not give in the question of whether or not to cut spending will dominate the nations political discourse for months on end and will spill over into the 2012 election.
To assure that it will the Republicans should hold firm to their budget spending cuts without surrender or compromise. If necessary it is OK to vote a few very short-term continuing resolutions to keep the government open for a few weeks at a time always keeping on the pressure.
When the debt limit vote comes up they should refuse to allow an increase without huge cuts in spending. If the debt-limit deadline passes they should force the administration to scramble to cobble together enough money to operate for weeks at a time.
If Obama offers a half a loaf the GOP should spurn it for weeks and months. Then rather than actually shut down the government let them accept some variant of their proposed cuts but only give in return a few more weeks time at which point the issue will be re-litigated. Dont go for Armageddon -- just keep fighting the battle.
Same with the debt limit. Extend it for a few hundred billion dollars and then go back for more cuts in return for a further extension. Make Obama pay for each continuing resolution and each debt-limit hike with more cuts to spending.
Always avoid cuts in Medicare and Social Security. Save those for after 2012. For now focus on Medicaid block granting and discretionary spending (including some modest cuts in defense).
Like a guerrilla army never go to a shutdown (a general engagement) but keep coming up with cuts compromising letting the government stay open for a few more weeks letting the debt limit rise a few hundred billion and then come back for more cuts and repeat the cycle.
And dont just demand spending cuts. Go for defunding of Obamacare blocking the EPA from carbon taxation and regulation a ban on card-check unionization and constraints on the FCCs regulation of the Internet and talk radio. Put those items on the table each time each session.
Every time the issues come up every time the cuts are litigated Obamas efforts to appear to be a centrist will be frustrated. Time and again he will have to oppose spending cuts. Over and over he will come across as the liberal he is battling for each dime and opposing any defunding.
Obamas campaign strategy has two elements: Change the subject from the 09-10 agenda and move to the center. A tough determined Republican budget offensive embracing all these elements and fought in this guerrilla style will frustrate both and lead to his defeat.
