Abbott & 9 Other Attorneys General Challenge Obamacares Religious-Based Mandate

width=126Texas Insider Report: AUSTIN Texas The more we learn about Obamacare the more unconstitutional it becomes. This mandate is a stunning trampling of freedom of religion by forcing religious-based hospitals and clinics to act contrary to their religious doctrine. These mandates force religious organizations and hospitals to subsidize products and moral judgments that clearly violate their beliefs."

Texas Attorney General Greg Abbott as he & Attorneys General from 9 other states earlier today called on the Obama Administration to rethink their Obamacare mandate forcing religious-based hospitals clinics and service organizations to offer insurance covering contraceptive products & services which violate their religious beliefs.    

Full text of the letter: February 10 2012 The Honorable Kathleen Sebelius The Honorable Timothy Geithner Secretary Secretary U.S. Department of Health and Human Services U.S. Department of the Treasury 200 Independence Avenue S.W. 1500 Pennsylvania Avenue N.W. Washington D.C. 20201 Washington D.C. 20220 The Honorable Hilda Solis Secretary U.S. Department of Labor 200 Constitution Avenue N.W. Washington D.C. 20210 Dear Secretaries Sebelius Geithner and Solis: As Attorneys General of our respective states we are writing to express our strong opposition to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services mandate requiring religious employers that provide health insurance coverage to their employees to include coverage for contraceptives sterilization and related services. Should this unconstitutional mandate be promulgated we are prepared to vigorously oppose it in court. The proposed regulations would compel religious affiliated organizations hospitals universities and social service entities to subsidize contraceptive products and services which clearly violate their religious beliefs. We are deeply troubled by the unprecedented coercion of organizations and individuals to act contrary to their religious beliefs. The only viable alternative for these employers is to penalize their employees by ceasing the provision of health insurance altogether. The choice for such organizations essentially becomes: provide and subsidize activity in contravention with core religious beliefs eliminate employer-provided health coverage or withdraw from public ministry. The proposed mandate provides an insufficiently narrow exemption which would fail to include religious affiliated organizations who do not primarily employ persons who share their religious tenets" and do not have the inculcation of religious values" as their primary operational purpose. Such an exemption ignores the fact that many such organizations only exist and provide public ministry pursuant to a duty and sense of purpose derived from their religious beliefs. To obtain the exemption a religious organization would have to subject itself to the equivalent of a government religious audit" to determine whether the organizations activities are sufficiently religious to be excluded from the regulations requirements. Even then a great number of entities previously exempt from government regulations that run contrary to their religious beliefs would fail to qualify. Not only is the proposed contraceptive coverage mandate for religious employers bad policy it is unconstitutional. It conflicts with the most basic elements of the freedoms of religion speech and association as provided under the First Amendment. It would compel religious organizations to act subsidize products and affirmatively promote a message in contravention with their religious principles with the sole alternative being to cease activities of incalculable value to their employees constituents and indeed society as a whole. We strongly oppose the unconstitutional approach taken by the proposed contraceptive coverage mandate. We believe it represents an impermissible violation of the Constitutions First Amendment virtually unparalleled in American history. Accordingly we urge you in the strongest way possible to refrain from promulgating the proposed regulations. Sincerely Greg Abbott Attorney General of Texas Jon Bruning Attorney General of Nebraska    Alan Wilson Attorney General of South Carolina Luther Strange Attorney General of Alabama Pam Bondi Attorney General of Florida James Caldwell Attorney General of Louisiana William Schneider Attorney General of Maine Wayne Stenehjem Attorney General of North Dakota Mike DeWine Attorney General of Ohio Scott Pruitt Attorney General of Oklahoma Marty J. Jackley Attorney General of South Dakota John W. Suthers Attorney General of Colorado
by is licensed under
ad-image
image
11.20.2024

TEXAS INSIDER ON YOUTUBE

ad-image
image
11.20.2024
image
11.19.2024
ad-image