The Senate Majority Leader seems to think he can and will
Texas Insider Report: WASHINGTON D.C.
The Tea Party was the result of a terrible economy. Ive said that many times and I believe that. That (the Tea Party) will pass. They will lose a number of seats next year.
Reid left the indelible impression as long as hes leading the Senate Democrats the Tea Party agenda is dead on arrival. There will be no reductions & entitlement reforms without tax increases.
Reid singled out the rich & oil companies as especially deserving of punishment during an hour-long Q&A session with 30 Las Vegas Review-Journal staffers Friday.
Reid expects Tea Party to fade away
Opinion: By Glenn Cook
Can Harry Reid wait out the Tea Party? The Senate majority leader seems to think so.
Reid sat down with more than 30 Las Vegas Review-Journal staffers Friday for an hour-long
Q&A session at the newspapers offices.
Reid blamed everything that ails Washington and the nation on Republicans. He slammed the GOP for its refusal to go along with tax increases as part of this months debt-ceiling deal saying hard-core fiscal conservatives are making it impossible to strike a long-term deal that slows the growth of the national debt.
(Senate Minority Leader) Mitch McConnell has done a good job bringing the country to a standstill Reid said.
The reason Republicans have drawn such a deep line in the sand on tax increases of course is the Tea Party movement. The populist uprising that was born from Washingtons bailouts achieved critical mass after Democrats decided to start spending like no government before.
- The stimulus.
- The ObamaCare overreach.
- Budget deficits that made President George W. Bush look like a piker.
Democrats were tossed from office in record numbers last November. That groundswell is shaping the 2012 campaign.
But Reid doesnt expect it to last.
Reid has amassed his considerable power by never underestimating his adversaries. And he has been known to throw out strategic fibs to create misdirection.
Perhaps Reid is still savoring his November re-election victory over Tea Party darling Sharron Angle. Perhaps hes oblivious to the number of Democrats in both House and Senate races sprinting to the right to boost their 2012
chances.
Perhaps its just wishful thinking.
But theres no way the Tea Party is going away -- certainly not before the 2012 elections and certainly not when the national debt is projected to shoot past $20 trillion before the end of the decade. Anyone who minimizes the Tea Party by extension minimizes the massive spending problems that created it in the first place.
Reid rationalizes that those problems are all Republicans fault. He opened Fridays group interview with a two-minute reminder that George W. Bush is responsible for the countrys spending and Americas economic woes. After all Bush inherited a projected $7 trillion budget surplus from Bill Clinton. (Never mind that Clinton served his final six years over a Republican-controlled Congress. They had nothing to do with that period of spending restraint.)
Theres no denying that Bush did little to rein in the fat-and-happy Congresses that shoveled out the pork during his first six years in office. That deficit spending did incalculable political damage allowing Democrats to position themselves to the right of Republicans on fiscal policy and falsely run as conservatives in 2008.
But budget deficits under Bush were in the $100 billion to $400 billion range mostly related to the post 9/11 wars. The Obama administration -- working with a Democratic House and Senate its first two years -- set the course for budget deficits of more than $1 trillion into the distant future. Obama is on course to pile up more debt in three years than Bush did in eight.
Democrats -- led by Reid -- now own this countrys debt problem and its struggling economy. The 2012 election will be a referendum on Obama and Reid not Bush. The Tea Party will see to that.
Among other interesting things Reid had to say Friday: Echoing the sentiment of other Democrats and devoted Keynesians Reid said the failed stimulus just wasnt big enough.
I had $100 billion in infrastructure development in the bill but I needed three Republican votes. Arlen Specter Olympia Snowe and Susan Collins made me get rid of it.