This expansion of the governments hacking & surveillance authority simply goes too far."
Texas Insider Report: WASHINGTON D.C. Were in the midst right now of one of the biggest battles in the privacy world that we have faced" s
aid Cong. Blake Farenthold (left) as he and
Congressman Ted Poe (right)
Cong. John
Conyers along with
Congresswoman Zoe Lofgren introduced
H.R. 5321 the Stop Mass Hacking Act earlier today. This is the companion bill to legislation introduced on the Senate side by Senators Ron Wyden (D-OR) and Rand Paul (R-KY).
Because of the horrendous terrorist attacks weve witnessed theres a willingness to give up some of our freedoms and privacy in order to feel safe Farenthold said.
Thats completely understandable but if we keep down this path were going to wake up in a few years in George Orwells 1984.
This is why as we fight for security the intrusion on privacy necessary to fight the war on terror needs to be narrowly tailored and aggressively overseen" said Farenthold.

Representatives Poe Conyers Farenthold and Lofgren are leading the fight to protect Americans freedoms by introducing the Stopping Mass Hacking Act in the House of Representatives" said Senator Ron Wyden (right) the lead Senate sponsor of the bill.
Theyre proof that a growing bipartisan coalition agrees that this expansion of the governments hacking and surveillance authority simply goes too far" Wyden said.
The Department of Justice recently moved to make an Administrative Rule Change to Rule 41 of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure that would give the government the ability to hack the computers of a massive amount of American citizens just by obtaining a single warrant.
If Congress does not act by December 1 2016 this change will be in effect.
The Stop Massive Hacking Act prevents these changes to Rule 41 from going into effect.
Government does not have the authority to unilaterally legalize widespread government hacking" said Texas Cong. Ted Poe.
Americans have rights. It is Congress responsibility to safeguard the constitutional rights of the people they represent from a power hungry Executive Branch.
As such we are moving to stop this change that condones hacking the property of the very people we are entrusted to protect" Poe said.
I stand by the Stop Mass Hacking Act because I am not yet convinced that the proposed changes to Rule 41 are wise or necessary" said Rep. Conyers.
This rule change is designed to streamline investigative techniques that allow law enforcement to gain unauthorized access and control to remote computer systems. Until Congress has had an opportunity to examine this proposal in detail and until we have adequately addressed the privacy concerns raised by my colleaguesthis rule change should not take effect."
This bill hits pause on a new rule which facilitates hacking of foreign entities and hijacking devices owned by the victims of malware

attacks without their permission" said Rep. Lofgren (left).
These troubling activities and the international privacy and security ramifications which may arise as a result deserve serious deliberation and debate in Congress" Lofgren said.
Read a one-page summary and bill text of the Stopping Mass Hacking (SMH) Act.