By Thomas Sowell
When Supreme Court Justices retire there is usually some pious talk about their service especially when it has been a long service.
But the careers of all too many of these retiring jurists including currently retiring Justice John Paul Stevens have been an enormous disservice to this country.
Justice Stevens was on the High Court for 35 years-- mores the pity or the disgrace. Justice Stevens voted to sustain racial quotas created rights out of thin air for terrorists and took away American citizens rights to their own homes in the infamous Kelo decision of 2005.
The Constitution of the United States says that the government must pay just compensation for seizing a citizens private property for public use. In other words if the government has to build a reservoir or bridge and your property is in the way they can take that property provided that they pay you its value.
What has happened over the years however is that judges have eroded this protection and expanded the governments power-- as they have in other issues. This trend reached its logical extreme in the Supreme Court case of Kelo v. City of New London. This case involved local government officials seizing homes and businesses-- not for public use as the Constitution specified but to turn this private property over to other private parties to build more upscale facilities that would bring in more tax revenues.
Justice John Paul Stevens wrote the Supreme Court opinion that expanded the Constitutions authorization of seizing private property for public use to seizing private property for a public purpose. And who would define what a public purpose is? Basically those who were doing the seizing. As Justice Stevens put it the government authorities assessment of a proper public purpose was entitled to great respect by the courts.
Lets go back to square one. Just who was this provision of the Constitution supposed to restrict? Answer: government officials. And to whom would Justice Stevens defer: government officials. Why would those who wrote the Constitution waste good ink putting that protection in there if not to protect citizens from the very government officials to whom Justice Stevens deferred?
John Paul Stevens is a classic example of what has been wrong with too many Republicans appointments to the Supreme Court. The biggest argument in favor of nominating him was that he could be confirmed by the Senate without a fight.
Democratic presidents appoint judges who will push their political agenda from the federal bench even if that requires stretching and twisting the Constitution to reach their goals.
Republicans too often appoint judges whose confirmation will not require a big fight with the Democrats. You can always avoid a fight by surrendering and a whole wing of the Republican party has long ago mastered the art of preemptive surrender.
The net result has been a whole string of Republican Justices of the Supreme Court carrying out the Democrats agenda in disregard of the Constitution. John Paul Stevens has been just one.
There may have been some excuse for President Fords picking such a man in order to avoid a fight at a time when he was an unelected President who came into office in the wake of Richard Nixons resignation in disgrace after Watergate creating lasting damage to the publics support of the Republicans.
But there was no such excuse for the elder President Bush to appoint David Souter much less for President Eisenhower with back-to-back landslide victories at the polls to inflict William J. Brennan on the country.
In light of these justices records and in view of how long justices remain on the court nominating such people was close to criminal negligence.
If and when the Republicans return to power in Washington we can only hope that they remember what got them suddenly and unceremoniously dumped out of power the last time. Basically it was running as Republicans and then governing as if they were Democrats running up big deficits with lots of earmarks and interfering with the market.
But their most lasting damage to the country has been putting people like John Paul Stevens on the Supreme Court.
Thomas Sowell is a senior fellow at the Hoover Institute and author of The Housing Boom and Bust.
By Thomas Sowell
When Supreme Court Justices retire there is usually some pious talk about their service especially when it has been a long service.
But the careers of all too many of these retiring jurists including currently retiring Justice John Paul Stevens have been an enormous disservice to this country.
Justice Stevens was on the High Court for 35 years-- mores the pity or the disgrace. Justice Stevens voted to sustain racial quotas created rights out of thin air for terrorists and took away American citizens rights to their own homes in the infamous Kelo decision of 2005.
The Constitution of the United States says that the government must pay just compensation for seizing a citizens private property for public use. In other words if the government has to build a reservoir or bridge and your property is in the way they can take that property provided that they pay you its value.
What has happened over the years however is that judges have eroded this protection and expanded the governments power-- as they have in other issues. This trend reached its logical extreme in the Supreme Court case of Kelo v. City of New London. This case involved local government officials seizing homes and businesses-- not for public use as the Constitution specified but to turn this private property over to other private parties to build more upscale facilities that would bring in more tax revenues.
Justice John Paul Stevens wrote the Supreme Court opinion that expanded the Constitutions authorization of seizing private property for public use to seizing private property for a public purpose. And who would define what a public purpose is? Basically those who were doing the seizing. As Justice Stevens put it the government authorities assessment of a proper public purpose was entitled to great respect by the courts.
Lets go back to square one. Just who was this provision of the Constitution supposed to restrict? Answer: government officials. And to whom would Justice Stevens defer: government officials. Why would those who wrote the Constitution waste good ink putting that protection in there if not to protect citizens from the very government officials to whom Justice Stevens deferred?
John Paul Stevens is a classic example of what has been wrong with too many Republicans appointments to the Supreme Court. The biggest argument in favor of nominating him was that he could be confirmed by the Senate without a fight.
Democratic presidents appoint judges who will push their political agenda from the federal bench even if that requires stretching and twisting the Constitution to reach their goals.
Republicans too often appoint judges whose confirmation will not require a big fight with the Democrats. You can always avoid a fight by surrendering and a whole wing of the Republican party has long ago mastered the art of preemptive surrender.
The net result has been a whole string of Republican Justices of the Supreme Court carrying out the Democrats agenda in disregard of the Constitution. John Paul Stevens has been just one.
There may have been some excuse for President Fords picking such a man in order to avoid a fight at a time when he was an unelected President who came into office in the wake of Richard Nixons resignation in disgrace after Watergate creating lasting damage to the publics support of the Republicans.
But there was no such excuse for the elder President Bush to appoint David Souter much less for President Eisenhower with back-to-back landslide victories at the polls to inflict William J. Brennan on the country.
In light of these justices records and in view of how long justices remain on the court nominating such people was close to criminal negligence.
If and when the Republicans return to power in Washington we can only hope that they remember what got them suddenly and unceremoniously dumped out of power the last time. Basically it was running as Republicans and then governing as if they were Democrats running up big deficits with lots of earmarks and interfering with the market.
But their most lasting damage to the country has been putting people like John Paul Stevens on the Supreme Court.
Thomas Sowell is a senior fellow at the Hoover Institute and author of The Housing Boom and Bust.
