High Court Ruling Favors Prayer at Council Meeting

By Mark Sherman

us-supreme-courtWASHINGTON (AP) The Supreme Court said Monday that prayers that open town council meetings do not violate the Constitution even if they routinely stress Christianity.

The court said in 5-4 decision that the content of the prayers is not significant as long as officials make a good-faith effort at inclusion.

The ruling was a victory for the town of Greece N.Y. outside of Rochester.

In 1983 the court upheld an opening prayer in the Nebraska legislature and said that prayer is part of the nations fabric not a violation of the First Amendment. Mondays ruling was consistent with the earlier one.

Justice Anthony Kennedy writing for the majority said the prayers are ceremonial and in keeping with the nations traditions.

The inclusion of a brief ceremonial prayer as part of a larger exercise in civic recognition suggests that its purpose and effect are to acknowledge religious leaders and the institutions they represent rather than to exclude or coerce nonbelievers Kennedy said.

Justice Elena Kagan in a dissent for the courts four liberal justices said the case differs significantly from the 1983 decision because Greeces town meetings involve participation by ordinary citizens and the invocations given directly to those citizens were predominantly sectarian in content.

A federal appeals court in New York ruled that Greece violated the Constitution by opening nearly every meeting over an 11-year span with prayers that stressed Christianity.

by is licensed under
ad-image
image
11.20.2024

TEXAS INSIDER ON YOUTUBE

ad-image
image
11.20.2024
image
11.19.2024
ad-image