Its Not the Economy Stupid -- Its Limbaugh

By Larry Elder width=65You cant just listen to Rush Limbaugh and get things done the newly installed President Obama told Capitol Hill Republicans. Chief of staff Rahm Emanuel just days ago called the popular conservative radio talk show host the voice and the intellectual force and energy behind the Republican Party. Then Republican National Committee Chairman Michael Steele appeared on a CNN show hosted by comedian-turned-pundit D.L. Hughley. When Hughley called Limbaugh the de facto leader of the Republican Party Steele stepped right on top of the trap. No said Steele Im the de facto leader of the Republican Party and called Limbaugh an entertainer whose show can be incendiary and ugly. Steele later apologized to Limbaugh. Game set and match. As the tax-and-spend policies of the Obama administration extend and deepen the recession the new administrations strategy to deal with the fallout becomes clearer and clearer. Blame Rush Limbaugh. The Democrats according to Politico.com took a poll and discovered that Limbaugh polled higher negatives than those of the Rev. Jeremiah Wright and radical reform educator William Ayers. Given the departure of their reliable pinatas -- former President George W. Bush and former Vice President Dick Cheney -- Democrats believe theyve found a new Darth Vader. Blame Rush Limbaugh. In the waning pre-TARP days of the Bush administration the national deficit stood at about $500 billion. A panicked Bush and Congress then voted for the $700 billion Troubled Asset Relief Program to bail out the banks. Obama signed a $789 billion economic stimulus package and Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner announced a $2.5 trillion rescue plan for the financial system. Even CNBCs Jim Cramer a former Obama supporter called the administrations approach the greatest wealth destruction Ive seen by a president. Blame Rush Limbaugh. Obama as part of his $3.6 billion budget intends to spend -- strike that -- invest on things such as creating green jobs combating the effects of climate change health care and enabling homeowners to remain in their unaffordable homes. How does the President intend to pay for all these things? He wants to tax the rich -- those earning $250000 or more. He also promises to close tax loopholes taken advantage of by the wealthy. What to do when this European-style redistribution of wealth fails to achieve its desired objectives? Blame Rush Limbaugh. The U.S. government already controls nearly 50 percent of health care spending. The Obama administration through regulation and mandates intends for government to control the rest. What happens when -- as in Canada France and elsewhere -- this fails to achieve its stated goal of accessibility affordability and accountability? Blame Rush Limbaugh. The 20 banks that received the most of the original TARP money actually reduced not increased their lending. And some used the money to buy other institutions. So how does the administration explain the failure of the bailout money to unfreeze lending? Blame Rush Limbaugh. The government now holds equity positions in several institutions including but not limited to the giant insurer AIG. Since taking these positions the governments market value has dropped placing the taxpayers deeper and deeper in the hole. General Motors one of the Small Three received -- so far -- some $13.4 billion in federal loans. But its losses continue and GM now says it needs an additional $16.6 billion. Blame Rush Limbaugh. The president promised to eliminate pork earmarks and/or special projects designed to please constituents. The $789 billion spending spree plan he recently signed is larded with pork-barrel projects. How does he square this legislation with his promise to end pork spending? Blame Rush Limbaugh. Republicans deserve harsh criticism for failing to rein in non-defense non-homeland security spending when they controlled the presidency and both houses of Congress. Republicans helped gut the Freedom to Farm Act (designed to wean farmers from subsidies); OKd pork-riddled energy and highway bills; expanded the federal governments role in education through among other things the No Child Left Behind Act; passed -- with the prescription benefits bill for seniors -- the largest expansion of Medicare in decades; and increased government regulation as much as or more than under Democratic administrations. But the Obama administration now puts spending on steroids and all but three Republicans voted against the latest legislation. How does the Obama administration explain its failure to achieve its vaunted bipartisanship? Blame Rush Limbaugh. RNC Chairman Steele needs to focus on the merits of the Republican approach -- lower taxes less government domestic spending and fewer regulations. Punishing high achievers by taxing them destroys incentive and thus destroys jobs. Transferring money from one pocket to another destroys the initiative of the giver and the given. Private capital knows best whether how and when to invest. The private sector creates or saves jobs not government. When Obamas new New Deal fails to achieve the desired objectives we already know what happens next. Blame Rush Limbaugh who by the way is not just laughing all the way to the bank. At todays bargain-basement prices he probably owns several. Larry Elder is host of the Larry Elder Show on talk radio and author of Showdown : Confronting Bias Lies and the Special Interests That Divide America .
by is licensed under
ad-image
image
04.24.2025

TEXAS INSIDER ON YOUTUBE

ad-image
image
04.24.2025
image
04.22.2025
ad-image