Must green become the new red white & blue?
Jonah Goldberg
The greening of the country including the creation of green jobs has proved unworkable and expensive. It was a massive flatbed truck flanked by smaller vehicles brandishing oversized load banners carrying a huge white thing.
I think the first one I saw was in Ohio. But I know that by the time I passed Grand Island Neb. Id lost count.
What was it? At first it looked like it could be a replacement for the Swords of Qādisīyah that giant crossed blades sculpture in central Baghdad.
And then the aha: It was a propeller blade for a wind turbine a really big one.
Ive seen plenty of wind farms but Id never seen the blades being transported for construction. Last week I saw a lot of them.
Why? Because they were on the road and so was I. My 8-year-old daughter and I were on a summer adventure. We drove more than 2000 miles from Washington D.C. to eventually Steamboat Springs Colo. (Dont worry I did most of the highway driving.)
Something about seeing all those turbine propellers made me think of wartime mobilization like FDRs ramp-up during the Lend-Lease period or Josef Stalins decision to send Soviet heavy industry east of the Urals.
The comparison isnt completely daft either. The notion that we should move to a war footing on energy has been a reigning cliche of U.S. politics ever since Jimmy Carters Oval Office energy crisis address in 1977. This difficult effort will be the moral equivalent of war except that we will be uniting our efforts to build and not to destroy.
Ever since weve been hearing that green must become the new red white and blue.
Its difficult to catalog all of the problems with this nonsense. For starters the mission keeps changing. Is the green energy revolution about energy independence? Or is it about fighting global warming? Or is it about jobs?
For most of the last few years the White House and its supporters have been saying its about all three. But thats never been true. If we want energy independence (and Im not sure why we would) or if we want to reduce our dependence on Middle Eastern oil (a marginally better proposition given
that Canada and often Mexico supply the U.S. with more oil than Saudi Arabia) we would massively expand our domestic drilling for oil and gas and our use of coal or carbon-free nuclear. That would also create lots of jobs that cant be exported (you cant drill for American oil in China but we can and do buy lots of Chinese-made solar panels).
As for the windfall in green jobs that has always been a con job.
For instance Barack Obama came into office insisting that Spain was beating the U.S. in the rush for green jobs. Never mind that in Spain where unemployment is now at 21 the green jobs boom has been a bust. One major 2009 study by researchers at King Juan Carlos University found that the country destroyed 2.2 jobs in other industries for every green job it created and the Spanish government has spent more than half a million euros for each green job created since 2000. Wind industry jobs cost a cool $1 million euros apiece.
The record in America has been no better Obamas campaign stump speeches notwithstanding. The New York Times which has been touting the green agenda in its news pages for years admitted last week that federal and state efforts to stimulate creation of green jobs have largely failed government records show. Even Obamas former green jobs czar concedes the point as do other leading Democrats including Rep. Maxine Waters of Los Angeles.
Perhaps the most pathetic part of the war to green America is how unwarlike it really is. The New York Times also reported that Californias weatherization program was initially delayed for seven months while the federal Department of Labor determined prevailing wage standards for the industry a direct sop to labor unions. And afterward the inflated costs made the program too expensive for homeowners.
Green jobs like shovel-ready jobs proved a myth in no small part because Obama is eager to talk as if this green stuff was the moral equivalent of war but hes not willing or able to do things a real war requires.
What were left with is not the moral equivalent of war but the moral equivalent of a quagmire. A very expensive quagmire.
