War will continue until the end... (Daniel 9:26)
Like the Pulitzer Prize for journalism along with the Oscar and Emmy for film and television the Nobel Peace Prize is an inside job in which liberal wishful-thinking humanists give awards to each other.
For all I care the Nobel Committee could have given their useless (except for the money) prize to Homer Simpson. Like President Obama Homer has done nothing to earn it though he may be the only character who has been on TV more than the president.
According to the Website www.globalsecurity.org there are currently 42 active conflicts and/or wars in the world today. Not all are shooting wars at the moment and there are several civil wars and conflicts between Israel and various terrorist groups but 42 wars is a lot of war.
Peace generally occurs when aggressive evil is defeated which is why Germany and Japan no longer war with the United States. The Nobel Committee apparently believes that by diplomatically singing All we are saying is give peace a chance evil people will study war no more and be so impressed by our intentions they will lay down their arms.
Irans president Mahmoud Ahmadinejad could win the Nobel Peace Prize in an instant if he announced his god had told him not to eradicate Israel or usher in Armageddon. But Ahmadinejad wont because he is evil and must be defeated. Neither will he respond to negotiations or sanctions. Same with Osama bin Laden. The United Nations would welcome him as a speaker and the Nobel Committee would award him their top prize if he would announce he no longer believes in terrorism and has become a follower of the Dali Lama or some other acceptable pseudo-deity. He also will do no such thing because he is evil and must be defeated.
The Nobel Committee believes George W. Bush is evil but apparently not bin Laden or Ahmadinejad. It cringes at leaders who wish to overcome evil by force rather than have the forces of evil overcome them. The Nobel Committee hates Israel too. And this is because its members and like-minded male wimps around the world idolize Michael J. Fox instead of John Wayne and find their role models in the liberal ladies of The View not in muscular characters like Jack Bauer (and Chloe who gets it) on 24.
The peace prize concept is flawed because the problem of war does not lie with those who would make peace but with those who would make war. If the Nobel Committee were realistic it would stop handing out peace prizes and start issuing awards for those who have confronted evil and produced peace in nations that have only known oppression. Candidates for such prizes would include Ronald Reagan Margaret Thatcher and Pope John Paul II who conspired to liberate Europe from the totalitarian hand of Soviet communism.
Bill Clinton would also be a legitimate candidate for his efforts that stabilized Bosnia. He could take some small credit for the peace in Northern Ireland which though worked on for decades was finally brokered on his watch. President Obama was right when he acknowledged that he doesnt deserve the prize. Neither did Yasser Arafat Henry Kissinger Le Duc Tho or Al Gore.
The question should be: why despite mans best efforts including the League of Nations and United Nations have we been unsuccessful in eradicating war? The answer lies in this ancient wisdom: What causes fights and quarrels among you? Dont they come from your desires that battle within you? You want something but dont get it. You kill and covet but you cannot have what you want. You quarrel and fight. You do not have because you do not ask God. When you ask you do not receive because you ask with wrong motives that you may spend what you get on your pleasures. (James 4:1-3)
Thats why a peace prize is meaningless.
Cal Thomas is co-author (with Bob Beckel) of the book Common Ground: How to Stop the Partisan War That is Destroying America.
War will continue until the end... (Daniel 9:26)
Like the Pulitzer Prize for journalism along with the Oscar and Emmy for film and television the Nobel Peace Prize is an inside job in which liberal wishful-thinking humanists give awards to each other.
For all I care the Nobel Committee could have given their useless (except for the money) prize to Homer Simpson. Like President Obama Homer has done nothing to earn it though he may be the only character who has been on TV more than the president.
According to the Website www.globalsecurity.org there are currently 42 active conflicts and/or wars in the world today. Not all are shooting wars at the moment and there are several civil wars and conflicts between Israel and various terrorist groups but 42 wars is a lot of war.
Peace generally occurs when aggressive evil is defeated which is why Germany and Japan no longer war with the United States. The Nobel Committee apparently believes that by diplomatically singing All we are saying is give peace a chance evil people will study war no more and be so impressed by our intentions they will lay down their arms.
Irans president Mahmoud Ahmadinejad could win the Nobel Peace Prize in an instant if he announced his god had told him not to eradicate Israel or usher in Armageddon. But Ahmadinejad wont because he is evil and must be defeated. Neither will he respond to negotiations or sanctions. Same with Osama bin Laden. The United Nations would welcome him as a speaker and the Nobel Committee would award him their top prize if he would announce he no longer believes in terrorism and has become a follower of the Dali Lama or some other acceptable pseudo-deity. He also will do no such thing because he is evil and must be defeated.
The Nobel Committee believes George W. Bush is evil but apparently not bin Laden or Ahmadinejad. It cringes at leaders who wish to overcome evil by force rather than have the forces of evil overcome them. The Nobel Committee hates Israel too. And this is because its members and like-minded male wimps around the world idolize Michael J. Fox instead of John Wayne and find their role models in the liberal ladies of The View not in muscular characters like Jack Bauer (and Chloe who gets it) on 24.
The peace prize concept is flawed because the problem of war does not lie with those who would make peace but with those who would make war. If the Nobel Committee were realistic it would stop handing out peace prizes and start issuing awards for those who have confronted evil and produced peace in nations that have only known oppression. Candidates for such prizes would include Ronald Reagan Margaret Thatcher and Pope John Paul II who conspired to liberate Europe from the totalitarian hand of Soviet communism.
Bill Clinton would also be a legitimate candidate for his efforts that stabilized Bosnia. He could take some small credit for the peace in Northern Ireland which though worked on for decades was finally brokered on his watch. President Obama was right when he acknowledged that he doesnt deserve the prize. Neither did Yasser Arafat Henry Kissinger Le Duc Tho or Al Gore.
The question should be: why despite mans best efforts including the League of Nations and United Nations have we been unsuccessful in eradicating war? The answer lies in this ancient wisdom: What causes fights and quarrels among you? Dont they come from your desires that battle within you? You want something but dont get it. You kill and covet but you cannot have what you want. You quarrel and fight. You do not have because you do not ask God. When you ask you do not receive because you ask with wrong motives that you may spend what you get on your pleasures. (James 4:1-3)
Thats why a peace prize is meaningless.
Cal Thomas is co-author (with Bob Beckel) of the book Common Ground: How to Stop the Partisan War That is Destroying America.
