
Obamas speech was simply painful to watch. It was filled with contradictions and the same tired leftwing rhetoric. At the beginning he feels obligated to say that the rich arent the bad guys but then spends the rest of the speech treating them as if they were.
Heres part of his early comments:
As a country that values fairness wealthier individuals have traditionally born a greater share of this burden than the middle class or those less fortunate. This is not because we begrudge those whove done well - we rightly celebrate their success. Rather it is a basic reflection of our belief that those who have benefitted most from our way of life can afford to give a bit more back.I know its just an introductory passage but there are already problems with it and they should be pointed out so people can recognize just how liberals think. First we have the word benefitted as if somehow the person who started a company or created a new invention did so by something other than their own hard work and perseverance. They werent given gifts or benefits while others werent. They earned them. They tried. They succeeded. In addition theres the phrase give a bit more back. Wow... where to start? First lets look at ACTUAL giving back... who funds the charitable organizations? Who gives to the poor? The poor? No. Those with the funds to do so are the ones who give

Worst of all this is a vision that says even though America cant afford to invest in education or clean energy; even though we cant afford to care for seniors and poor children we can somehow afford more than $1 trillion in new tax breaks for the wealthy. Think about it. In the last decade the average income of the bottom 90 of all working Americans actually declined. The top 1 saw their income rise by an average of more than a quarter of a million dollars each. And thats who needs to pay less taxes?Lets think about this. Lets say Obama is right and that the top 1 did see their incomes rise. Well... they pay most of the taxes anyway and now they are making more money. Their tax bracket is the highest of all at 35. This means if they are making more then they are paying more to the government. And Obama thinks this is a bad thing? Obama also twists the rhetoric to confuse the American people. It is our job to make sure Americans know the facts. A decade ago the tax rates were lowered for ALL Americans. There was a debate just a few months ago and those rates were left unchanged. So now Obama is talking about a tax break or tax cut for the rich. NO ONE is talking about that. We are talking about keeping the rates as is... for all people. But Obama calls maintaining the tax rate for the middle class as protecting them but calls maintaining the tax rate for the top bracket as a tax cut. Obama used the word millionaire four times in his speech. He used the word billionaire three times. Yet the top tax bracket starts at $250000. As Grover Norquist points out

This line from Ryan says it all: Exploiting peoples emotions of fear envy and anxiety is not hope its not change its partisanship.Obama has shown that he is incapable of leading. His budget speech correctly notes that entitlement programs soak up the majority of the budget. As is they will only soak up more with each passing year. Obama does not address this problem. He simply wants the rich to pay more taxes. So beware. Obamas speech was exactly how Ryan described it. Do we want a president who tries to rally support by making Americans jealous and envious of other Americans? What is a fair share anyway? Obama talks about it but never defines it. We all pay too much in taxes because we are trying to fund a government that spends too much. Obamas plan will only tax more and spend more but will not solve our fiscal
