By David Limbaugh
President Obama told a meeting of the National Governors Association: At some point weve got to do some governing. And certainly what we cant do is keep careening from manufactured crisis to manufactured crisis. Really?
Yes really. He added referring to the sequestration: These cuts do not have to happen. Congress can turn them off anytime with just a little bit of compromise.
Obama has repeatedly demonstrated that he does not consider himself bound by a duty of good faith to square with the American people. He has shown that he is unafraid to utter the most egregious distortions and exaggerations; he has no fear of being called on them.
Just consider the few assertions Ive cited. At some point weve got to do some governing. Does he mean that at some point he needs to quit using every possible opportunity to play golf on the publics dime that he should stop treating the peoples White House as a platform for permanently campaigning that he intends to forgo his Alinskyite tactics of bullying and demonizing in lieu of dealing with issues on the merits that he aims to quit flouting his legal obligation to present a budget and that he will begin to exercise leadership over his party and pressure its leaders in the Senate to pass a budget? I didnt think so.
How about his statement that we cant keep careening from manufactured crisis to manufactured crisis? Does he mean that he is finally going to renounce his policy first divulged by his former chief of staff Rahm Emanuel not to let a crisis go to waste that he regrets having painted a false picture of crisis about the nations uninsured to force Obamacare through Congress that he is sorry that he used the 2008 financial collapse as an excuse to enact recklessly irresponsible bills to spend more borrowed money under the guise of stimulating the economy that he is sorry he leapt on the Sandy Hook shootings to begin a frantic manufactured-crisis-driven crusade to ratchet up his effort to severely restrict the rights of gun owners that he plans to repent for falsely laying the blame for our disgracefully unbalanced budgets on the rich who are already contributing more than their fair share that he is going to square with the American people about the shameless hyperbole and corruption in his environmental agenda and cease and desist from his dishonest fear-mongering about carbon emissions to advance that agenda that he is sorry for exaggerating the effects of the Gulf oil spill in order to justify breaching his promises to remove restrictions on offshore drilling and that he is going to quit pretending that Americas infrastructure is in a crisis state of repair in order to fuel his case for ever-greater government control and the creation of public-sector jobs? I didnt think so.
Indeed if Obama is so weary of crisis governance of which he is the peerless master then why is he using these very same speeches to manufacture a phony crisis over the sequestration? We are talking about very small-percentage cuts here mostly in the rate of spending increases.
If Obama were interested in changing his MO from crisis-mongering to governance -- instead of doubling down on his effort to expand the scope reach and control of the federal government at any cost literally -- then he would quit characterizing every single activity of the enormously wasteful federal government as an essential service.
Private-sector businesses dont enjoy the luxury of simply injecting public funds into their ailing enterprises to avoid cutting expenditures they cant afford. Are private-sector businesses and employees that much less important to Obama than public-sector services and employees? Silly question.
In his ongoing crisis-stoking Obama never laments the real economic destruction his own policies have already caused. When he does deign to acknowledge economic difficulties he callously understates the dismal conditions were experiencing -- and the hardship people are already enduring as a result of his ideological intransigence against cutting spending and reforming entitlements.
But what makes Obamas oratorical flurry against crisis governance an even more insulting farce is that we do have a real wholly unmanufactured crisis looming that will affect far more than a limited number of government jobs and programs. At the risk of breaking an already broken record Id like to point out again that we are going bankrupt because Obama wont agree to spending cuts and entitlement reform.
It is time that he quit playing games and insulting our intelligence by blaming Republicans for the sequestration he authored and for allegedly refusing to compromise when they are the ones who have compromised. They have done so on taxes whereas he has refused to compromise on spending and entitlements. You make a deal with Obama and he moves the goal posts.
Seriously how can Obama continue this charade with a straight face? How long will the public tolerate it?
David Limbaugh brother of radio talk-show host Rush Limbaugh is an expert in law and politics and author of new book Crimes Against Liberty the definitive chronicle of Barack Obamas devastating term in office so far.
