In an opinion article in the Columbus Dispatch Ohio Republican Sen. Rob Portman announced that he has changed his mind and now supports same-sex marriage.
He wrote that on learning that one of his sons is gay he wrestled with how to reconcile my Christian faith with my desire for Will to have the same opportunities to pursue happiness and fulfillment as his brother and sister.
He is not the only prominent Republican to come to this view in this way. Former Vice President Dick Cheney is another.
And at the Conservative Political Action Committee convention a panel sponsored by the Competitive Enterprise Institute drew a large and approving crowd for a discussion labeled A Rainbow on the Right: Growing the Coalition Bringing Tolerance Out of the Closet.
Its clear now that support for same-sex marriage crosses party lines. Thats what one might expect from polls that show a huge shift of opinion on this issue over the last two decades.
In the early 1990s large majorities opposed same-sex marriage. In 1996 Bill Clinton didnt hesitate before signing the Defense of Marriage Act which barred the federal government from recognizing same-sex marriages. He now urges its repeal.
In 2004 after the Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court by a 4-3 margin discovered that the states 1780 Constitution required recognition of same-sex marriages George W. Bush supported the Family Marriage Amendment which would bar such marriages across the nation.
That was never going to be ratified but it did help Bush mobilize tradition-minded voters in states like Ohio in the 2004 election.
Now many polls show majorities or pluralities of Americans favor same-sex marriage. Last November voters in Maine Maryland and Washington approved same-sex marriage.
Voters in Minnesota rejected a constitutional amendment that would ban it. Thats in contrast to the results in 30 states all but one of them in 2008 or earlier where voters approved similar amendments.
Many of those states would surely vote the other way now including California whose 52-to-48 percent vote against same-sex marriage in 2008 was overturned by federal trial and appeals courts in a case now before the Supreme Court.
The Supreme Court could rule that the Constitution requires same-sex marriage everywhere. Or it could affirm the appeals courts rationale which applies to California only.
Or it could say that the Constitution leaves this issue to the states. Thats the outcome that as a supporter of same-sex marriage I prefer.
Nine states and the District of Columbia have legalized same-sex marriage most by legislative or popular vote. Another 11 states have no constitutional amendment barring it.
And the 30 states with such constitutional amendments could repeal those amendments by popular vote.
That would require continuing debate and discussion. A good place to start is for everyone to recognize that as Portman writes well-intentioned people can disagree on the question of marriage for gay couples.
I believe that large majorities of people on both sides take their stands out of good motives. Yes you can find some haters on both sides if you look hard.
But the large majority of Americans believe that their view -- traditional marriage or extension of marriage to same-sex couples -- is or would be good for individuals and good for society.
Backers of traditional marriage can cite hundreds of years of experience and tradition. Backers of same-sex marriage can cite the growing acceptance of gay individuals and couples in all parts of the country.
Those who oppose it fear it will weaken the institution of marriage. But so far I havent seen evidence that extending marriage to the 3 or 4 percent who are gay has weakened the institution nearly as much as the much larger number of Americans who get divorced or have children without getting married at all.
This is an issue that divides Americans not just on partisan or religious but most conspicuously on generational lines. Young people including many Republicans heavily favor same-sex marriage. Elderly people including many Democrats heavily oppose it.
If opinion continues to move toward same-sex marriage it will be a tough issue for Republicans since most of their voters currently are opposed. But it will be a tough issue for some Democrats as well since many black voters are staunchly opposed.
But its an issue we can handle better if we respect and acknowledge the good faith of those on the other side.
Michael Barone senior political analyst for The Washington Examiner (www.washingtonexaminer.com) is a resident fellow at the American Enterprise Institute a Fox News Channel contributor and a co-author of The Almanac of American Politics.
In an opinion article in the Columbus Dispatch Ohio Republican Sen. Rob Portman announced that he has changed his mind and now supports same-sex marriage.
He wrote that on learning that one of his sons is gay he wrestled with how to reconcile my Christian faith with my desire for Will to have the same opportunities to pursue happiness and fulfillment as his brother and sister.
He is not the only prominent Republican to come to this view in this way. Former Vice President Dick Cheney is another.
And at the Conservative Political Action Committee convention a panel sponsored by the Competitive Enterprise Institute drew a large and approving crowd for a discussion labeled A Rainbow on the Right: Growing the Coalition Bringing Tolerance Out of the Closet.
Its clear now that support for same-sex marriage crosses party lines. Thats what one might expect from polls that show a huge shift of opinion on this issue over the last two decades.
In the early 1990s large majorities opposed same-sex marriage. In 1996 Bill Clinton didnt hesitate before signing the Defense of Marriage Act which barred the federal government from recognizing same-sex marriages. He now urges its repeal.
In 2004 after the Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court by a 4-3 margin discovered that the states 1780 Constitution required recognition of same-sex marriages George W. Bush supported the Family Marriage Amendment which would bar such marriages across the nation.
That was never going to be ratified but it did help Bush mobilize tradition-minded voters in states like Ohio in the 2004 election.
Now many polls show majorities or pluralities of Americans favor same-sex marriage. Last November voters in Maine Maryland and Washington approved same-sex marriage.
Voters in Minnesota rejected a constitutional amendment that would ban it. Thats in contrast to the results in 30 states all but one of them in 2008 or earlier where voters approved similar amendments.
Many of those states would surely vote the other way now including California whose 52-to-48 percent vote against same-sex marriage in 2008 was overturned by federal trial and appeals courts in a case now before the Supreme Court.
The Supreme Court could rule that the Constitution requires same-sex marriage everywhere. Or it could affirm the appeals courts rationale which applies to California only.
Or it could say that the Constitution leaves this issue to the states. Thats the outcome that as a supporter of same-sex marriage I prefer.
Nine states and the District of Columbia have legalized same-sex marriage most by legislative or popular vote. Another 11 states have no constitutional amendment barring it.
And the 30 states with such constitutional amendments could repeal those amendments by popular vote.
That would require continuing debate and discussion. A good place to start is for everyone to recognize that as Portman writes well-intentioned people can disagree on the question of marriage for gay couples.
I believe that large majorities of people on both sides take their stands out of good motives. Yes you can find some haters on both sides if you look hard.
But the large majority of Americans believe that their view -- traditional marriage or extension of marriage to same-sex couples -- is or would be good for individuals and good for society.
Backers of traditional marriage can cite hundreds of years of experience and tradition. Backers of same-sex marriage can cite the growing acceptance of gay individuals and couples in all parts of the country.
Those who oppose it fear it will weaken the institution of marriage. But so far I havent seen evidence that extending marriage to the 3 or 4 percent who are gay has weakened the institution nearly as much as the much larger number of Americans who get divorced or have children without getting married at all.
This is an issue that divides Americans not just on partisan or religious but most conspicuously on generational lines. Young people including many Republicans heavily favor same-sex marriage. Elderly people including many Democrats heavily oppose it.
If opinion continues to move toward same-sex marriage it will be a tough issue for Republicans since most of their voters currently are opposed. But it will be a tough issue for some Democrats as well since many black voters are staunchly opposed.
But its an issue we can handle better if we respect and acknowledge the good faith of those on the other side.
Michael Barone senior political analyst for The Washington Examiner (www.washingtonexaminer.com) is a resident fellow at the American Enterprise Institute a Fox News Channel contributor and a co-author of The Almanac of American Politics.
