

Invocations have opened presidential administrations legislative sessions and judicial proceedings throughout our Nations history."
The states brief also argues that the U.S. Supreme Court has repeatedly ruled that governmental institutions public acknowledgments of God are constitutional. In a 1983 case styled Marsh v. Chambers for example the high court upheld the constitutionality of state and federal governments opening every legislative session with a clergy-led prayer. The states explain that the district courts decision not only strikes down the National Day of Prayer but also threatens Memorial Day. The federal law establishing Memorial Day requests that the president issue a proclamation calling on the people of the United States to observe Memorial Day by praying according to their individual religious faith for permanent peace." The states explain thatif the district court is correct and Congress may not enact laws that require the president to issue a proclamation inviting those who wish to pray to do so then the statute providing for the observance of Memorial Day would presumably be unconstitutional as well."
Finally the 29 states argue that the ruling of the federal district court in Wisconsin also threatens the states own traditions of issuing prayer proclamations. For example the brief notes that Gulf coast state officials designated Sunday June 27 a day of prayer due to the recent oil spill. The states argue that if the National Day of Prayer is unconstitutional the actions of the governors of all 50 States will likewise be called into doubt for doing nothing more than acknowledging our Nations religious heritage consistent with our Nations customs and traditions."