The True National Debt

By Robert Samuelson Robert-SamuelsonWASHINGTON -- How big is the national debt? Youd think this would be an easy question. Surely we know how much the government owes. Unfortunately its not that simple. The true national debt could be triple the conventional estimate anywhere from $11 trillion to $31 trillion by my reckoning. The differences mostly reflect explicit and implicit off-budget federal loan guarantees. In another economic downturn these could result in large losses that would be brought on budget and worsen already huge deficits. Thats the danger. My purpose is not to scare or sensationalize. Its simply to illuminate the problem. Broadly conceived the national debt covers all debts for which the federal government assumes final responsibility. For politicians the appeal of off-budget programs is that they allow the pleasure of spending without the pain of taxing. But they also create massive exposure for government. Lets see why. Below are five estimates of the national debt. I compare each with our national income (gross domestic product) which is the economic base to service debts. In fiscal 2012 GDP was $15.5 trillion. Some economists say a debt ratio exceeding 90 percent slows economic growth. The United States already exceeds this threshold on four of my five measures. (1) TREASURY DEBT HELD BY THE PUBLIC: $11.3 trillion 73 percent of GDP for fiscal 2012. This is the most common measure of the national debt. Reflecting past annual deficits it represents what must be borrowed through sales of Treasury bills notes and bonds. In 2007 the figures were only $5 trillion and 36 percent of GDP. Todays levels -- as a share of GDP -- are the highest since World War IIs immediate aftermath. (2) GROSS FEDERAL DEBT: $16 trillion for 2012 103 percent of GDP. This definition includes the debt held by the public (above) plus the Treasury securities issued to government trust funds the largest being Social Security. Economists dislike this debt concept because the trust-fund Treasury securities represent one part of the government owing another. Its comparable to lending yourself money. Congress could cancel these debts though it almost certainly wont. The trust-account Treasury securities represent political commitments more than financial obligations. (3) FEDERAL LOANS AND LOAN GUARANTEES: $2.9 trillion in 2011 19 percent of GDP. The government makes or guarantees loans to college students farmers veterans small businesses and others. The face value of most of these loans dont show up in the budget but the government is on the hook if borrowers default. Adding this debt (19 percent of GDP) to gross federal debt produces a total debt ratio of 122 percent of GDP. (4) FANNIE AND FREDDIE: $5.1 trillion 33 percent of GDP. The government wasnt legally required to cover the debts of these government sponsored enterprises -- the major lenders to the housing market -- but almost everyone assumed it would if they got in trouble. That happened in September 2008. With Fannie and Freddie the total debt ratio rises to 155 percent of GDP. (5) THE FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE CORPORATION: $7.3 trillion 47 percent of GDP. Thats the insurance protection on bank accounts up to $250000. Including the FDIC brings the total debt ratio grows to 202 percent of GDP. So the most expansive measure of national debt ($31 trillion) is nearly three times the conventional estimate ($11 trillion). Almost all the items on my list -- whether Treasury bonds or bank deposits -- are ultimately legal obligations of the federal government. Note: They differ from Social Security and Medicare benefits which are often called debts. They arent. Congress can alter the benefits anytime it chooses. Now let me add some less alarmist qualifications. First some federally backed credit programs confer huge benefits. The FDICs insurance prevented a depositors panic in the financial crisis. It also has a $25 billion insurance fund to cover payments. Second most federally backed credit goes to private borrowers who should be able to repay. Lax credit standards may produce some defaults but in normal times they should be a tiny fraction of the total. Usually these programs arent a major drain on taxes. By contrast borrowing to cover budget deficits is not automatically self-liquidating. The rub is that we dont live in normal times as that term was used. Credit expanded on the upbeat belief that steady economic growth marred only by modest recessions would enable most debts to be serviced. The financial crisis and Great Recession demolished this permissive presumption. As the slump deepened off-budget commitments became on-budget costs. Bank rescues swamped the FDICs resources; mortgage losses impelled the Fannie and Freddie takeovers. Something similar could happen again. A deep downturn could cause a cascade of defaults on off-budget guarantees that require on-budget bailouts. The lesson: We should reject new off-budget commitments and curb some that already exist.
by is licensed under
ad-image
image
05.03.2025

TEXAS INSIDER ON YOUTUBE

ad-image
image
04.30.2025
image
04.28.2025
ad-image