Critics and defenders of the harsh interrogation methods applied to captured terrorists can argue forever over whether those methods were torture. But any serious discussion of a serious issue -- and surely terrorism qualifies as serious -- has to move beyond semantics and confront the ultimate question: Compared to what alternative?
If you knew that there was a hidden nuclear time bomb planted somewhere in New York City -- set to go off today -- and you had a captured terrorist who knew where and when would you not do anything whatever to make him tell you where and when? Would you pause to look up the definition of torture? Would you even care what the definition of torture was when the alternative was seeing millions of innocent people murdered?
Senator Dianne Feinsteins recent release of a massive report on the CIAs severe interrogation methods used against captured Islamic terrorists has set off a firestorm of controversy. It is hard to see what benefit the United States of America gains from releasing that report. But it is painfully obvious what lasting damage has been done to the security of Americans.
One of the most obscene acts of the Obama administration when it first took office was to launch a criminal investigation of CIA agents who had used harsh interrogation methods against captured terrorists in the wake of the devastating September 11 2001 aerial attacks on the World Trade Center and the Pentagon.
Right after those terrorist attacks when there were desperate fears of what might be coming next these CIA agents were trying to spare fellow Americans another attack that could take thousands more lives or perhaps millions more. To turn on these agents years later after they did what they were urged to do as a patriotic duty in a time of crisis is both a betrayal of those who acted in the past and a disincentive to those in the future who are charged with safeguarding the nation.
Other nations whose cooperation we need in order to disrupt international terrorist networks see how their involvement has now been revealed to the whole world -- including terrorists -- because supposedly responsible American officials in the Congress of the United States cannot keep their mouths shut.
The publics right to know has often been invoked to justify publicizing confidential information. But is there any evidence that the American public was clamoring to learn state secrets which every government has? I dont know where our nuclear weapons are located and I dont want to know certainly not at the cost of letting our enemies know.
The ease with which politicians are willing to pull the rug out from under people whose job is to safeguard our lives -- whether they are CIA agents the police or the military -- is not only a betrayal of those people but a danger to us all.
People who are constantly denouncing the police including with demonstrable lies may think they are showing solidarity with people in the ghettos. But when police hesitate to go beyond kinder and gentler policing that leaves decent people in black communities at the mercy of hoodlums and thugs who have no mercy.
When conscientious young people of any race who would like to help maintain peace and order see that being a policeman means having race hustlers constantly whipping up mob hostility against you -- and having opportunistic politicians and the media joining the race hustlers -- those young people may well decide that some other line of work would be better for them.
High crime areas need not only the most but the best police they can get. Taking cheap shots at cops is not the way to get the people who are needed.
When people who volunteer to put their lives on the line in the military to defend this country at home and abroad see their buddies killed on the battlefield and sometimes themselves come back minus an arm or a leg or with severe physical and mental damage that they may never get over -- and then see some headstrong politician in the White House throw away everything they fought for and see enemy forces take back places for which Americans shed their blood that can be galling to them and a deterrent to others who might otherwise take their place in the future.
If we cannot see beyond the moment today we will pay dearly tomorrow and in many more tomorrows.
Thomas Sowell is a senior fellow at the Hoover Institute and author of The Housing Boom and Bust.
Critics and defenders of the harsh interrogation methods applied to captured terrorists can argue forever over whether those methods were torture. But any serious discussion of a serious issue -- and surely terrorism qualifies as serious -- has to move beyond semantics and confront the ultimate question: Compared to what alternative?
If you knew that there was a hidden nuclear time bomb planted somewhere in New York City -- set to go off today -- and you had a captured terrorist who knew where and when would you not do anything whatever to make him tell you where and when? Would you pause to look up the definition of torture? Would you even care what the definition of torture was when the alternative was seeing millions of innocent people murdered?
Senator Dianne Feinsteins recent release of a massive report on the CIAs severe interrogation methods used against captured Islamic terrorists has set off a firestorm of controversy. It is hard to see what benefit the United States of America gains from releasing that report. But it is painfully obvious what lasting damage has been done to the security of Americans.
One of the most obscene acts of the Obama administration when it first took office was to launch a criminal investigation of CIA agents who had used harsh interrogation methods against captured terrorists in the wake of the devastating September 11 2001 aerial attacks on the World Trade Center and the Pentagon.
Right after those terrorist attacks when there were desperate fears of what might be coming next these CIA agents were trying to spare fellow Americans another attack that could take thousands more lives or perhaps millions more. To turn on these agents years later after they did what they were urged to do as a patriotic duty in a time of crisis is both a betrayal of those who acted in the past and a disincentive to those in the future who are charged with safeguarding the nation.
Other nations whose cooperation we need in order to disrupt international terrorist networks see how their involvement has now been revealed to the whole world -- including terrorists -- because supposedly responsible American officials in the Congress of the United States cannot keep their mouths shut.
The publics right to know has often been invoked to justify publicizing confidential information. But is there any evidence that the American public was clamoring to learn state secrets which every government has? I dont know where our nuclear weapons are located and I dont want to know certainly not at the cost of letting our enemies know.
The ease with which politicians are willing to pull the rug out from under people whose job is to safeguard our lives -- whether they are CIA agents the police or the military -- is not only a betrayal of those people but a danger to us all.
People who are constantly denouncing the police including with demonstrable lies may think they are showing solidarity with people in the ghettos. But when police hesitate to go beyond kinder and gentler policing that leaves decent people in black communities at the mercy of hoodlums and thugs who have no mercy.
When conscientious young people of any race who would like to help maintain peace and order see that being a policeman means having race hustlers constantly whipping up mob hostility against you -- and having opportunistic politicians and the media joining the race hustlers -- those young people may well decide that some other line of work would be better for them.
High crime areas need not only the most but the best police they can get. Taking cheap shots at cops is not the way to get the people who are needed.
When people who volunteer to put their lives on the line in the military to defend this country at home and abroad see their buddies killed on the battlefield and sometimes themselves come back minus an arm or a leg or with severe physical and mental damage that they may never get over -- and then see some headstrong politician in the White House throw away everything they fought for and see enemy forces take back places for which Americans shed their blood that can be galling to them and a deterrent to others who might otherwise take their place in the future.
If we cannot see beyond the moment today we will pay dearly tomorrow and in many more tomorrows.
Thomas Sowell is a senior fellow at the Hoover Institute and author of The Housing Boom and Bust.
