Voters Are Desperate for Political Leadership

By Daniel Henninger - WSJ Welcome to the permanent American tea party. daniel-henningerYou will recall how when the tea-party movement erupted during the congressional recess in August it was spun on the left that these events were the creation of conservative ideologues. At the start yes. By the end though it was about anxieties deeper than that.   The GOP is now spinning the results in Virginia and New Jersey as proof that voters are fed up with the liberal ideologues in the White House and Congress. Yes but its deeper than that. What was learned Tuesday is that the American voter is absolutely totally unremittingly disgusted with both political parties. More than anything the American voter is desperate for political leadership. That electorates in two politically significant states led by the widening independent movement could swing within one year from enthusiasm for electing Barack Obama to support for Virginias OK Republican Bob McDonnell and New Jerseys lackluster Chris Christie is simply astonishing. Add another American metaphor to the political landscape: the cattle stampede. Independent voters across the U.S. have become like the massive cattle herd John Wayne drove from Texas to Kansas in Red River. These voters are spooked and on the run a political stampede that veered left in November 2008 and now right a mere year later. They will keep running--crushing incumbents candidates and political models of the left and right--through November 2010 and onto 2012 until they find a person or party capable of leadership appropriate to our unsettled times. And yes Virginia the possibility of a man on a white horse in 2012 is not out of the question. Exit polls in New Jersey and Virginia said the economy was on voters minds. Unemployment is near 10 and may stay there for a year. But its deeper than that. This isnt just another turn in the business cycle. On Sept. 15 2008 the economic structure of the U.S. imploded. Lehman Brothers a synonym for the American financial bedrock filed for bankruptcy. On June 1 2009 General Motors once a synonym for American economic primacy filed for bankruptcy and was effectively nationalized. In the nine months between these two iconic events the American people were riveted to news of economic distress. The signal event of the 2008 presidential election was the day in September when Sen. John McCain suspended his campaign to deal with the financial crisis. Within 48 hours his candidacy stood naked. Mr. McCains instincts were right; The American people wanted leadership. But he didnt have a clue how to provide it. The restless herd ran toward Barack Obama. Now theyre ready to run toward someone else. They just did in New Jersey and Virginia. This is not normal. A new American presidency especially this one should not be in this much trouble 10 months into a four-year term. Nor would it be if not for the economic events that fell out of September 2008. Absent the immediate need to steady the credit markets and deal with a deepening recession the Obama White House would have introduced--and passed--its restructuring of the U.S. health-care system in early spring. Instead voters watched Congress create and pass a nearly trillion-dollar stimulus bill and then erect the worlds tallest national budget--a towering $3.5 trillion. They watched the Obama Treasury now hard-wired to the Federal Reserve intervene massively in the structure of the private economy. There was an attempted federal climate-control bill an attempted expansion of union organizing rights (card check) and second thoughts on free-trade agreements. Only then in June was this hyperactive government able to introduce its health-care proposal--the public option the remaking of the insurance industry a 5.4 tax surcharge the expansion of Medicaid. After his election Mr. Obamas strongest attribute was limitless self-confidence. He was a man aglow with knowledge control and . . . leadership. Now with the scale and cost of Mr. Obamas ambitions so clear the question many voters are asking is whether the Obama governments reach exceeds its grasp or abilities--or any governments. The most acute voters know these are not normal times. The Obama vision so far looks a lot like the social-market economic model of Europe where leaders such as Nicolas Sarkozy and Angela Merkel give homilies about the crisis of capitalism. If American voters then look toward Asia they see rising economies using capitalism to supplant Europe. American voters know theyve reached a long-term economic tipping point. Which way to go old West or new East? They understand the challenges are growing while the politicians seem to be shrinking. So the Republicans won Tuesday. Now what? Just as the Democrats in 2008 ran mainly against Bush the Republican political model seems to be to let Democratic failure dump states like New Jersey and Virginia into their control. But I think most voters no matter their party registration know that in the past 12 months the stakes for them have suddenly become larger than political control. Unless leadership emerges equal to the new world voters see they have fallen into volatility in Americas election returns is going to be the norm for a long time. Daniel Henninger is deputy editor of The Wall Street Journals editorial page.
by is licensed under
ad-image
image
03.13.2025

TEXAS INSIDER ON YOUTUBE

ad-image
image
03.11.2025
image
03.10.2025
ad-image