The coronavirus outbreak provides a compelling argument against Bernie’s so-called ‘Medicare for All’ program, which would accelerate infectious disease outbreaks
By Christopher Jacobs
Bernie Sanders’s burst of momentum following his strong showings in Iowa, New Hampshire and Nevada should help draw greater attention to his "Medicare for All" single-government-payer health care proposal, as China struggles to control a coronavirus outbreak that first emerged at the end of last year.
The two events are linked by more than just time.
The coronavirus outbreak provides a compelling argument against Sanders’s so-called “Medicare for All” program, which would upend the health-care system’s ability to respond to infectious disease outbreaks.
In an Outbreak, Could You Obtain Care?
For starters, supporters of Sanders’s plan have admitted that under his "Medicare for All" single-government-payer, not all patients seeking care will obtain it.
In 2018, People’s Policy Project President Matt Bruenig claimed that while demand for care might rise under single payer, “aggregate health service utilization is ultimately dependent on the capacity to provide services, meaning utilization could hit a hard limit.”
By eliminating virtually all patient payments for their own care, single payer would increase demand for care — demand Bruenig concedes the system likely could not meet, even under normal circumstances.
Consider that an outbreak centered more than 6,000 miles from the Pacific coast has already led to a run on respiratory face masks in the United States. During a widespread outbreak on our shores, an influx of both sick and worried-but-well patients could swamp hospitals already facing higher demand for “free” care.
Bureaucrats’ Questionable Spending Priorities
While Sanders’s "Medicare for All" single-payer legislation attempts to provide emergency surge capacity for the health-care system, experience suggests federal officials may not spend this money wisely.
Section 601 of the House and Senate single-payer bills include provisions for a “reserve fund” designed to “respond to the costs of treating an epidemic, pandemic, natural disaster, or other such health emergency.” However, neither of the bills include a specific amount for that fund, leaving all decisions for the national health care budget in the hands of the Department of Health and Human Services.
And federal officials demonstrated a questionable sense of policy priorities in the years leading up to the 2014 Ebola outbreak. Of the nearly $3 billion from Obamacare’s Prevention and Public Health Fund given to the Centers for Disease Control in the years 2010-2014, only about 6 percent went towards building epidemiology and laboratory capacity.
Instead, CDC spent $517.3 million funding grants focused on objectives like “improving neighborhood grocery stores” and “promoting better sidewalks and street lighting.”
CDC has since stopped funding these community transformation grants, but because the Sanders bill gives federal agencies—not Congress—the power to determine spending levels for the entire single-payer system, bureaucrats could once again decide to promote objectives secondary to the federal government’s prime objective: Keeping Americans safe from invasion, whether from armies or disease.
Socialized Medicine Brought to Its Knees By…the Flu?
Including a system of global budgets as part of a transition to single payer would leave hospitals with little financial flexibility to cope with a sudden surge of patients.
Sanders’s Senate version of "Medicare for All" single-government-payer legislation does not include such a payment mechanism, but the House single-payer bill does.
Sen. Elizabeth Warren and other liberal think-tanks believe the concept, which provides hospitals lump-sum payments to cover the facilities’ entire operating budget, can help reduce health-care costs.
But in its May 2019 report on single payer, the Congressional Budget Office noted that consistently slow growth of global budget payments in Britain’s National Health Service has “created severe financial strains on the health care system.”
And Rising hospital bed occupancy rates have created longer wait times in emergency rooms, with patients stuck on gurneys for hours.
In one example of its annual “winter crisis,” two years ago the NHS postponed 55,000 surgeries due to capacity constraints, with one ER physician apologizing for “3rd World conditions of the department due to overcrowding.”
A British health system barely able to cope with a predictable occurrence like a winter flu outbreak seems guaranteed to crumble in the face of a major pandemic.
Voters lured by the siren song of socialism should bear that in mind as they ponder news of the coronavirus and Sanders’ “Medicare for All."
Chris Jacobs is Founder & CEO of Juniper Research Group, and author of the book, "The Case Against Single Payer." He is on Twitter: @chrisjacobsHC.