Medias Hatred of Trump Only Hurts Itself

Warped anti-Trump news outlets act as propagandists ignoring or distorting facts that contradict their view of him. By Michael Goodwin Texas Insider Report: NEW YORK New York  Imagine 63 million Americans being written off because they disagree with the media elites politics. I am concerned that todays media leaders refuse to see their destructive role in the war with the president. In fact few even show any remorse over how the relentlessly hostile coverage of Trump is damaging the nation and changing journalism for the worse. This month marks the two-year anniversary of one of the most important articles ever written on journalism. On Aug. 7 2016 after Donald Trump formally secured the Republican nomination and the general election campaign was under way New York Times media columnist James Rutenberg began with a question:

If youre a working journalist and you believe Donald J. Trump is a demagogue playing to the nations worst racist and nationalistic tendencies that he cozies up to anti-American dictators and that he would be dangerous with control of the United States nuclear codes how the heck are you supposed to cover him?"

Under the Times traditional standards the right answer is that you wouldnt be allowed to cover any candidate you were so biased against. But thats not the answer Rutenberg gave. Instead quoting an editor who called Hillary Clinton normal" and Trump abnormal" Rutenberg suggested normal standards" didnt apply. He admitted that balance has been on vacation" since Trump began to campaign and ended by declaring that it is journalisms job to be true to the readers and viewers and true to the facts in a way that will stand up to historys judgment." I wrote then that the article was a failed attempt to justify the lopsided anti-Trump coverage in the Times and other news organizations. It was indeed that and more for it also served as a dog whistle for anti-Trump journalists telling them it was acceptable to reveal their biases. After all history would judge them. Weeks later Dean Baquet the Times executive editor told an interviewer the Rutenberg article nailed" his thinking and convinced him that the struggle for fairness was over. I think that Trump has ended that struggle" Baquet boasted. I think we now say stuff. We fact-check him. We write it more powerfully that its false." Because the Times is the liberal medias bell cow:

1. The floodgates were flung open to routinely call Trump a liar a racist and a traitor.
2. Standards of fairness were trashed as nearly every prominent news organization demonized Trump and effectively endorsed Clinton.
3. This open partisanship was a disgraceful chapter in the history of American journalism.

Yet the shocking failure of that effort produced no change in behavior. After the briefest of mea culpas for failing to see even the possibility of a Trump victory the warped coverage continued and became the media wing of the resistance movement. Which is how we arrived at the latest low moment in journalism. This one involved the more than 300 newspapers (including The Post) that followed the Boston Globe and especially his accusation that they are the ­enemy of the people." The high-minded among the media mob insisted they were joining together to protect the 1st Amendment and Freedom of the Press. In fact the effort looked smelled and felt like self-interest and rank partisanship masquerading as principle. True to their habit most of the papers expressed contempt for the president and some extended that contempt to his supporters.

Nancy Ancrum (right) the editorial page editor of the Miami Herald told Fox News that her paper joined the effort without any hope of changing the minds of Trump supporters because they are just too far gone." Imagine that 63 million Americans are written off because they disagree with the media elites politics. Echoes of Clintons deplorables" comment ring loud and clear.

I agree that Trump is wrong to call the media the enemy of the people" and wish he would stick to less inflammatory words. His ­favorite charge of fake news" makes his point well enough without any hint that he favors retribution on individual journalists. But I am also concerned that media leaders refuse to see their destructive role in the war with the president. Few show any remorse over how the relentlessly hostile coverage of Trump is damaging the nation and changing journalism for the worse. One obvious consequence is increased political polarization with many media outlets making it their mission to denounce Trump from first page to last day in and day out. Studies show 90 of TV news coverage is negative and the Times Washington Post and CNN among others appear addicted to Trump ­hatred as if it is a narcotic. This lack of balance permits little or no coverage of any of his achievements. How many people for example know about the employment records shattered by the jobs boom unleashed by Trumps policies?

• Black unemployment stands at 5.9 the lowest rate on record.
• For Latinos it is 4.5 also the lowest on record.
• For women its the lowest rate in 65 years.
• For young people its the lowest since 1966.
• Those statistics mean millions of people are getting their shot at the American dream  How can that not be newsworthy?

Rest assured that if Barack Obama had achieved those milestones they and he would have been celebrated to the high heavens. Yet when it comes to Trump nothing is ever good. Having decided he is unfit to be president most news groups act as propagandists ignoring or distorting facts that contradict their view of him. While media manipulation hurts Trumps popularity there is a second ironic impact: The skewed coverage is doing even more damage to public trust in the media itself. A Gallup/Knight Foundation survey of 1440 panelists earlier this year found that:

• Adults estimate 62 of the news they read in newspapers see on television or hear on the radio is biased" and that
• 44 of news" is inaccurate.

Separately Axios and SurveyMonkey polled nearly 4000 adults in June and found that:

• 70 believe mainline news organizations report as news things they know to be fake false or purposely misleading."
• Among Republicans and GOP-leaning independents an astonishing 92 harbor that distrust...
• As do 53 of Democrats.

And get this: Two-thirds of those who believe there is rampant false news say it usually happens because journalists have an agenda." Clearly the distrust is not limited to Trump supporters. These numbers reflect an urgent crisis of confidence in the press. And its getting worse. A Gallup survey three years ago found that 40 trusted the media; two years ago the trust meter declined by 8 to 32. Now even that low bar looks like the good old days. Yet instead of soberly examining their conduct most in the media ratchet up the vitriol apparently believing that screaming louder and longer will lead the public to hate Trump as much as they do. But as the surveys show their bias is a boomerang. With media behavior undermining public trust more than anything Trump says or does a return to traditional standards of fairness and a separation of news from opinion are essential. Michael Goodwin is a New York Post Columnist and Fox News Contributor. Follow him on Twitter at @mgoodwin_nypost.