While House Republicans tighten their belts, Democrats haven’t exactly been lining up to join them
By Kevin McCullough
If you’re looking for proof that one party still has a shred of seriousness left in this shutdown circus, look no further than two recent developments: a growing roster of lawmakers voluntarily rejecting paychecks while Washington is locked down, and President Trump vowing to the troops that “every last penny” of their pay will be honored despite the stalemate.
These aren’t just gestures for show — they underscore a fundamental contrast between those willing to take real hits for principle and those content to posture for cameras and cable hits.
From Rep. Chip Roy (right, R-Texas) to Ashley Hinson (R-Iowa), Tom Barrett (R-Mich.), Mariannette Miller-Meeks (R-Iowa), and Rob Bresnahan (R-Pa.), a growing number of Republican lawmakers have formally requested that their pay be withheld during the shutdown. Some senators — like Lindsey Graham — have gone further, pledging to donate their salaries while the impasse continues.They don’t have to do it. Federal law requires that members of Congress be paid even during a shutdown, and the 27th Amendment ensures their salaries can’t be altered until after the next election.
So yes, it’s technically symbolic — but in a world where symbolism has become the coin of political currency, this gesture carries real weight.
It says, “If we’re forcing ordinary Americans to live without a paycheck because government is bloated, wasteful, or mismanaged, then we should share in that pain.” That’s leadership by example — a rare thing in a city addicted to finger-pointing and immunity from consequence.
While these lawmakers tighten their belts, Democrats in Congress haven’t exactly been lining up to join them.
They’re still collecting full pay while lecturing about “shared sacrifice.” They talk endlessly about compassion, equity, and fairness — but when it comes time to lead by example, they vanish faster than a government grant on a pet project.
The same contrast shows up on the other side of Pennsylvania Avenue. While bureaucrats wring their hands and the media breathlessly tally up “shutdown victims,” President Trump stood before troops and promised them “every last penny” of their pay.
He didn’t hedge it with an asterisk.
While these lawmakers tighten their belts, Democrats in Congress haven’t exactly been lining up to join them.
They’re still collecting full pay while lecturing about “shared sacrifice.” They talk endlessly about compassion, equity, and fairness — but when it comes time to lead by example, they vanish faster than a government grant on a pet project.
The same contrast shows up on the other side of Pennsylvania Avenue. While bureaucrats wring their hands and the media breathlessly tally up “shutdown victims,” President Trump stood before troops and promised them “every last penny” of their pay.
He didn’t hedge it with an asterisk.
He didn’t hide behind bureaucratic language. He looked the men and women who defend this country in the eye and said they will get paid. Period. In a time when most politicians’ statements sound like a lawyer’s footnote, that clarity matters. It’s called standing with the people who make the country function — not the ones who make it fail.
You can call it grandstanding, but here’s the difference: if you make a public promise to the troops and fail to deliver, you’ll pay for it politically. Trump knows that. He also knows the American people can tell the difference between a leader who puts his name behind a guarantee and politicians who mutter about “working groups” and “ongoing negotiations.” Democrats are masters of the empty press conference. Trump, love him or hate him, is a master of public accountability.
So yes — one party is trying to do what’s right for the American people during this shutdown. The other is trying to avoid blame.
One party is forfeiting its own pay and standing up for troops and taxpayers alike. The other is hiding behind procedures, pointing fingers, and pretending the problem is someone else’s fault.
This isn’t about optics; it’s about integrity.
Rejecting pay while government is frozen isn’t just symbolic — it’s moral pressure. It forces everyone else to look bad for not doing it.
One party is forfeiting its own pay and standing up for troops and taxpayers alike. The other is hiding behind procedures, pointing fingers, and pretending the problem is someone else’s fault.
This isn’t about optics; it’s about integrity.
Rejecting pay while government is frozen isn’t just symbolic — it’s moral pressure. It forces everyone else to look bad for not doing it.
When you say, “I’ll work without a check,” you flip the script. You expose the hypocrisy of colleagues who insist on collecting full pay while federal workers miss rent. You reveal the contrast between those who understand that public service means service — and those who think it means perks, pensions, and press conferences.
Likewise, when the Commander-in-Chief tells the troops their pay will be honored, he’s setting a moral standard. He’s saying, “You keep doing your duty, and I’ll keep mine.” That’s not a slogan — that’s a contract between leadership and those who sacrifice most. Every American with a family member in uniform understands how meaningful that is when bills come due and Washington gridlock drags on.
And that’s the real difference here. Accountability.
One side is saying, “We’ll sacrifice if you have to.” The other is saying, “We’ll talk about sacrifice while keeping our direct deposit active.”
One side is walking into the storm, absorbing the pain, and showing solidarity with the people. The other side is hiding behind podiums and political consultants, praying the polling looks better next week.
Symbolism matters, because character matters.
One side is walking into the storm, absorbing the pain, and showing solidarity with the people. The other side is hiding behind podiums and political consultants, praying the polling looks better next week.
Symbolism matters, because character matters.
In times of dysfunction, even small acts of principle can pierce the fog. Turning down a paycheck won’t balance the budget, but it will remind voters that someone still believes public office is a trust, not a meal ticket. Promising troops their pay isn’t a gimmick — it’s a declaration that America still honors duty and service, even when the bureaucrats can’t balance a spreadsheet.
So while Democrats tweet indignation and cable anchors run countdown clocks to “Shutdown Day 18,” it’s worth asking who’s actually doing something tangible. Who’s giving something up? Who’s leading when it costs them? Because when all the shouting fades, that’s what voters remember.
One side is playing politics. The other is paying the price. And for the American people watching this mess unfold, that difference couldn’t be clearer — or more important.
Kevin McCullough (@KMCRadio) breaks news as it happens on New York's Salem Media 570/970AM Radio. A nationally syndicated columnist, he produces broadcast/podcast content airing on 1,600+ outlets, seven days per week. 
